Israel Refuses to Withdraw Troops: U.S. and France Pressure Lebanon
Israel continues to hold five strategic positions beyond the border line, despite pressure from the U.S. and France, which had guaranteed the ceasefire.
Photo: idf.il
Israeli military announced that they will continue to hold five strategic positions beyond the border line, despite the expiration of the ceasefire agreement.
This has raised concerns in Lebanon and among international mediators, including the U.S. and France, which acted as guarantors of the agreement.
The ceasefire agreement, which came into effect on November 27 last year, was originally set for 60 days and was extended until February 18.
An Israeli army spokesperson stated that local residents would be allowed to return to their villages—Kfar Kila, Adisa, Hula, and Meiss El Jabal—but military forces would remain in strategic positions.
This issue has become a key topic in Lebanon’s political discussions. The president, prime minister, and speaker of parliament are holding consultations on further actions.
The government’s statement emphasizes the need to uphold sovereignty and comply with UN resolutions, including Resolution 1701, which calls for the full withdrawal of Israeli troops.
The U.S. has already issued a strict ultimatum to Lebanon: within a month, Beirut must disarm armed groups, including Hezbollah and Palestinian factions.
Otherwise, Washington has threatened to escalate the Lebanese issue to the UN level and seek the introduction of international military control under Chapter VII of the UN Charter.
Israel-Lebanon Ceasefire Agreement
In November 2024, Israel, Lebanon, and mediators, including the U.S. and France, signed a ceasefire agreement for 60 days. Israel must withdraw its troops from southern Lebanon, while Hezbollah is required to retreat beyond the Litani River.
An international group led by the U.S. is overseeing compliance, while 5,000 Lebanese troops have been deployed to maintain order.
The agreement was seen as a diplomatic success for the U.S., but concerns remain over the weakness of the Lebanese army and the potential for both sides to violate the terms.